Like Nancy Pelosi said after March 4th, there's no reason for the superdelegates to be jumping the gun and choosing sides yet.  Let the contests play out and keep track of public sentiment such as these latest findings from SUSA.

By the way, I think SUSA has gained a lot of credibility this election cycle.  They might now be considered one of the premiere polling outfits.

Poll-picking and interpreting results in the margin of error does not make a good story...

RealClearPolitics multi-poll average:

Obama v McCain:

Poll    Date    Sample    McCain (R)    Obama (D)    Und    Spread
RCP Average    02/20 - 03/02    -    42.9    47.1    6.9    Obama +4.2

Clinton v McCain:

Poll    Date    Sample    McCain (R)    Clinton (D)    Und    Spread
RCP Average    02/20 - 02/25    -    46.0    45.8    5.0    McCain +0.2

Well, I guess we'll see if it lasts.

One poll and Obama's leads over McCain are being proven fake?  I think not.

Both can... and WILL beat John McCain in November.

The trending is definitely been in Hillary's favor over the 10 days. Other national polls are echoing SUSA. Todd has a piece on the front page showing the trend that Obama is bleeding non-Dems. It's definitely something to watch.

Yes, Obama is toast, and he can only become the Democratic nominee if Clinton's wins in Florida and Michigan are either not considered or "re-worked," meaning that the millions who cast ballots for Hillary in Michigan and Florida would be asked to have their actual first votes nullified--unprecedented in American politics.

Obama may be the candidate of Wyoming and Mississippi, and a host of other Red States and very unrepresentative caucuses (many of Obama's state wins were through caucuses), but he will have lost every major state in the country (and certainly Pennsylvania as well) except his own.

No presidential candidate of either major party has ever been nominated with such a dismal record of defeats in major states.  To nominate someone with such a record would be to ask for political suicide in a general election.

In Ohio, the ultimate bell-weather state, wherein for much of the past century our citizens determine presidential election year winners, the clear majority of our voters (on either side of the spectrum) proclaimed an emphatic "no" to Barack Obama last Tuesday.

We, like now much of the nation, have resented the media's attempts to shove this untested, wholly unqualified, and ridiculously arrogant, freshman senator down our throats.

We have always known that for the MSM 2008 was not about electing Obama (after all toast in November), but utilizing him as a tool to prevent the return of the Clintons.

After Ohio and Texas, the MSM's mission cannot be accomplished without disenfranchising voters in Florida and Michigan.  Bill and Hillary Clinton really don't need the Democratic Party (it was decades in the presidential wilderness before them and will return to that wilderness without them)--the party desperately needs them.

And I recollect as an Ohioan being besieged with Obama messages from all forms of media--television ads running twenty to thirty times a day, and flyers coming in multiples daily for the last two weeks of the campaign--but all of that Obama money did nothing to make the clear majority of Ohioans say no to his candidacy.

Either the Democratic Party chooses Hillary or it goes down to a likely 48-state defeat come November.  Moveon.org, and fellow Obama blogosphere enthusiasts, Oprah Winfrey worshippers, Ted Kennedy, Bill Bradley, John Kerry, and Howard Dean losers club members nothwithstanding, it is time to throw your candidate aside--if you want the Democratic Party to survive in November.

Much less the nation afterwards.