Why Rachel Maddow scares them.

Rachel Maddow does not hold her tongue and when she does let go, it's intelligent and painfully precise and somewhat personal.  If you were watching the coverage of the first night of the Democratic Convention on MSNBC and witnessed this comment, then you know what I'm talking about (around the 2 minute mark and if you can't stand Pat, go on to 3:40).

Maddow is not afraid of who she is, this is it.  Maddow is no plastic Anderson Cooper who has dodged questions about his sexuality and yet written extensively of other aspects of his personal life (which mind you, he is perfectly right in choosing what he shares with people).  Maddow has an amazing balance of who she is in that it does not eclipse anything else about her, it's balanced sanity in a "post rational" world and it's what I most admire about her.

Now think about it, Rachel is not afraid to talk about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, so can you imagine having this finely focused mind covering the war with much more clarity and vigor than the entire MSM combined?  Of course they're scared and it's just in time for the election where the war has to be at the forefront of our minds.

If you are like me, you enjoy the fact that Maddow leads off every hour of her show with, "News from Iraq and life during wartime".   How often do we hear the mainstream media or the Administration refer to this as life during wartime?  We've become insulated from the reality that this Country is at war and the consequences of this war reaches into almost every aspect of our lives (Cost of Oil, food prices, inflation, devaluation of the dollar, our inability to fight just wars such as helping the people in Darfur and so on).

So the war is merely somewhere in the back of our minds and the impact it has on our daily lives is focused on our legislators and administration.  People wonder why Obama is doing better in the polls when 75% of America thinks we are going in the wrong direction.  Um, that's because the people who were voted in to change things in 2006 have yet to end this war and change the path of our Country.  Of course they are skeptical.  (Also, my partisan friends, unlike us, the majority of Americans don't really care about political parties, they just want someone to fix this mess, Republican or Democrat.  It's our job to prove to them that Democrats are much better equipped to deal with the current fiasco and that we have the intention of creating the kind of America the most of us believe is possible).

So, just imagine hearing the phrase on a nightly basis, Life during wartime.   Since none of us were asked to buckle down and make sacrifices for this war we are feeling the pain has been forced upon us (Yes, the fact that this Administration has pulled back regulations on the mortgage industry and many other irresponsible fiscal policy does matter but they were able to do this with the distraction of not war but terror, the threat was enough to distract us and we were told to go out and spend, don't worry about the future, no reason to save, spend spend spend.  Wow, those Chickens have come home to roost.)

Maddow talks about issues that we don't normally here on the MSM and is much more commonly found on Air America.  Maddow is going to shine the light on some very scary corners of the room that have been neglected for far too long.  I can't tell you how much I'm looking forward to this show, I'm really quite beside myself.  I openly credit Maddow (And her guru David Bender) for keeping me sane during the primary's most heated moments.  

And I've been a fan for a while.  Why?  Because Maddow has not shied away from putting right wing males in their place with her intellectual ability.  Tucker Carlson's only redeeming quality was that he was smart enough to share his airtime with Maddow (and I know you cheered when she got Joe Scarborough to walk off in a huff on live television, brilliant!).

This is why Rachel Maddow scares them.  She speaks her mind, she does so in a way that is without the kind of partisan venom that we are used to at Fox News and she does it with a smile on her face.  Another one here, Maddow's take on us "Godless Democrats"...

And to end this, another brilliant smack down of Pat B. by Rachel Maddow.  I'm telling you, I love this woman (Doesn't hurt that she got her start in radio in Northampton, MA where I went to Smith College!)  I love too that you can see she's getting ready to put the hurt on Pat.  "The Democratic Party stands for women".  Amen sister!

Ultimately the choice MSNBC made has many implications about that Glass ceiling that we've been talking about in connection to Hillary Clinton.  I believe that Maddow has also been making some cracks in that thing over the past few years and the fact that she's going to be having her own show is one of the biggest cracka in a long time for the women's movement and feminism.  

Not only should we see Clinton's candidacy as a victory but also Maddow's ascension in a business of high skirts and plunging necklines as another win for all women.  Now that really scares them.



Display:


Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 3)

I got in an argument (Friendly) with someone here about Rachel.

Because she DIDN'T call out the sexist pigs on MSNBC, she was on the Clinton shit-list, according to this poster.

Ok, you can think what you think, I guess.

But, if you saw Rachel Maddow fricking eat Pat Buchannan's lunch the other night, when he started on his "how the Republicans will treat Obama at their convention" spiel, I wanted to stand up and yell:

FINALLY SOMEONE WITH THE CAJONES TO CALL THAT BIGOT OUT!

Rachel Maddow is THE smartest most honest pundit on TV right now.

She may scare the right, but having that voice on TV may indeed be the best news the left has had for years.


Our long national nightmare is over...in 17 days!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:03:32 PM EST

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 5)

And thanks for reminding me that Tucker no longer has a show and RACHEL DOES!


"I don't know too much about Sarah Palin, but perhaps that's the good news." -- GOP Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
by Obama44 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:15:34 PM EST

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 4)

Um... Anyone else start thinking "McCain POW" at the 1:30 point of the second to last clip (right after Maddow smacks down Coulter as an ad hominem debater) when Tucker starts saying that "just because you survived something bad doesn't mean you have any more moral authority"?


by TCQuad on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:44:31 PM EST

I absolutely did. (2.00 / 1)

I am comforted to know that conservatives like Tucker and Anne are not going to allow Sen. McCain to parlay his status as a POW, i.e. victim of war, into a claim of experience or expertise. *supersnark*
by Liberal Monk on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 03:32:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Meh. Rachel is okay (2.00 / 2)

I think Rachel is becoming the new ubergod of the blogoshpere, since Olbermann's nutty qualities are seeping out. To me though, she's just meh.

Don't get me wrong, I like her commentary for the most part. But she tends to have a one track mind, and harp on an issue over and over and over again.


by Chelsea in 2020 on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:52:00 PM EST

Re: Meh. Rachel is okay (2.00 / 2)

She's human!  I really hope she will have her Guru, David Bender on with her, I think he really helps keep her grounded.

No one is perfect and I think the success of Maddow points to other things changing in our society.


Mr. Ellinorianne for CA State Senate! (Gary Pritchard ActBlue CA-SD-33)
by Ellinorianne on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 03:08:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 5)

It helps that she's smarter than most of the other pundits rolled up together.


by Cincinnatus on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 02:52:18 PM EST

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 2)

That was interesting to hear Maddow talk about Buchanan's 1992 convention speech.  It was also worth listening all the way to the end of the clip to hear Eugene Robinson explain that Buchanan is not "post-rational," as Maddow likes to put it, but "pre-rational."  Beautiful!

I confess that I have some respect for the way Pat Buchanan generally just sits there and takes it when the other pundits take these digs at him that have a subtext of racism or bigotry.  You might say he takes it like a man, only that's not actually the way most men tend to take it.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 03:50:53 PM EST

The other great thing about Rachel (2.00 / 2)

is she attacks the ideas not the person.  There are many pundits on TV who don't know the difference, can't make the distinction in their critiques or refuse to know the difference when they are the focus of the criticism.  


Mr. Ellinorianne for CA State Senate! (Gary Pritchard ActBlue CA-SD-33)
by Ellinorianne on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 03:56:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The GOP template for Michelle Obama (2.00 / 3)

is the same template Buchanan had for Hillary in 1992.

Scary, angry woman. In Hillary's case, it was scary radical feminist who hates men.

In MO's case it is angry black woman who hates whitey.


"Once in a while you get shown the light In the strangest of places if you look at it right"
by molly bloom on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 05:39:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The GOP template for Michelle Obama (2.00 / 3)

Wow, think what the template for Rachel looks like.

Female, Gay AND smarter then all the men.

OVERLOAD!!!!!!!!!!!


Our long national nightmare is over...in 17 days!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 06:22:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 1)

As a total aside, I love Northampton.  I lived there for most of the 1990s.


by Dreorg on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 04:03:20 PM EST

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (none / 0)

I went to Smith from 1994 to 1997, I loved Northampton.  I miss the Haymarket, Paradise Video?  I got Sushi when I had the money from the Japanese place on Main Street.  There were a few places I went to regularly.

I saw John Wesley Harding at the Iron Horse (And a couplf of other concerts in fact, the Nields! and the Gigolo Aunts.

It was just an amazing little town that was really easy to get around in without a car.  


Mr. Ellinorianne for CA State Senate! (Gary Pritchard ActBlue CA-SD-33)
by Ellinorianne on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 06:25:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 1)

I was the Friday Night doorman (among other things) at the North Star until it got sold and turned into The Grotto.


by Dreorg on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 08:12:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Rachel Maddow is Da Bomb (2.00 / 4)

She was pitch perfect throughout the primary season.  She and Bill Press were the talkies that got it the most right in my opinion.  I suspect that Rachel was for Obama, but you wouldn't know it.  And Press has said he was for Clinton but was so balanced in his approach throughout.


by activatedbybush on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 04:33:28 PM EST

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 2)

I've always liked Rachel Maddow and you really have to give kudos to MSNBC for giving her a show (to Democrats like us, it seems a no-brainer, but the general public?).
I'm not much on watching cable news, but I'll have to try to tune in.
Great diary!
"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 04:43:51 PM EST

You forgot the most important part: (2.00 / 3)

She's cool as hell.


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 05:40:25 PM EST

Oh, I thought (2.00 / 2)

that was a given!


Mr. Ellinorianne for CA State Senate! (Gary Pritchard ActBlue CA-SD-33)
by Ellinorianne on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 06:19:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oh, I thought (2.00 / 3)

Yeah, but it's so COOL just to say it!


Our long national nightmare is over...in 17 days!
by WashStateBlue on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 06:24:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why Rachel Maddow scares them. (2.00 / 1)

Anybody notice that in the third video at about the 1:45 mark, Tucker Carlson says "Suffering through something does not give you any moral authority, it does not make you wise."
McCain anyone?
by EvilAsh on Wed Aug 27, 2008 at 08:50:58 PM EST

They *should* be scared. (2.00 / 1)

Rhodes scholar, unflappable, telegenic, well informed, fairminded, and progressive (not to mention female and out of the closet)--no wonder she's blowing their minds.  


by chiefscribe on Sat Aug 30, 2008 at 05:35:26 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.